- Database of Resources
- Important Themes
- Guides for Lecturers
- Events and Workshops
- Teaching Development Projects
- Materials Awareness Projects
Materials Technology, or Materials Science and Engineering, is a subject that crosses many boundaries. It draws on the fields of physics, chemistry and maths and applies them to all different applications in engineering. It bears its own unique qualities and difficulties as a result of this diversity in thinking styles bringing about the possibilities of deep approaches to learning. However, students have little understanding of what they will meet on the course, often they have little awareness of Materials Technology and have entered the course as their second or third choice.
The QAA Subject overview report (1999) suggests that most institutions:
are experiencing 'considerable difficulties in recruiting suitably qualified entrants' and that there is ' a tension between the desire for access and student numbers and high rates of progression'.
This is considered a cause for concern especially in the first year of the programmes and:
'there is scope for improvement in progression and completion rates in many institutions'.
Despite this concern, overall the outcomes were considered encouraging and many institutions received very high ratings in all categories. Student support and guidance was the strongest contributor to the stated aims and objectives and particular note was made of the tutorial pastoral care and the good staff student relations.
This is made easier by the relatively small size of the classes in materials (average 30 students). However, there seems to be a significant problem if the level of support and tutorial mechanism is considered good and yet there is still a concern for student progression and completion rates in many institutions.
It is clear that with such small class sizes, the scope for teaching in small groups, or tutorials, is much higher than in other subject areas. It is also well known that small group teaching is ideal for dealing with learning difficulties associated with multiple learning styles, diverse cultural and academic backgrounds as well as motivation levels, all of which are potential reasons for the lower progression rates associated with lowering access standards. It may,therefore, be the case that the tutorial approach is not optimal and opportunities for learning are being lost. It has been stated in the Subject overview report:
'there is still an 'over-reliance' on traditional methods in some instances'.
It should be noted that recently the Materials community has been in a period of flux, with a growing number of Materials staff in the UK now being in broader Engineering Departments, due to recent changes in which many dedicated Materials Departments have been integrated within Engineering/Technology Schools. The current situation is as follows:
As such, there is a new range of issues relating to the teaching of Materials within a broad Engineering context that Materials staff must now deal with. Also, what works in some contexts and is considered best practice will not work in others, and as such the UK Materials community needs to develop and share their experiences.
This guide aims to reflect upon good practice in tutorial teaching within Materials programmes, and to disseminate this with all providers. Guidelines drawn from the study highlight strategies in tutorial systems to improve progression rates in all institutions, as well as enhancing employment prospects.
'Tutorials' can mean anything from a group of four students to a group of approximately thirty students, depending on the context. What you can do with the students largely depends on the size of the group.
When considering the diverse population of students, we need to be aware of and take account of differences in expectations, in academic ability, in age and maturity, in work related experience, in mathematical and physical science background knowledge and skill, in personality, spatial ability, cognitive type, learning style, cultural and language background, as well as gender. We need to be aware of what approach students take, because of their different experiences and filters of perception (Marton and Booth, 1997).
We must also assess the accessibility of various tutoring approaches for disabled students. Parker (1999) discuss some important issues relating to visually impaired students, deaf and hard of hearing students, students with medical conditions, students with physical disabilities, students with language and speech difficulties, students with learning difficulties (including dyslexia) etc. All of these disabilities may prevent students from learning in certain conditions and rooms.
Tutorials are very important for encouraging students to think - to compare ideas, give expressions to their understanding of a subject, help students to help each other, share and compare ideas, encourage active learning and exchange of ideas, evaluate and develop personal and professional values. Additionally, tutorials can be employed to acquire and practise important professional skills of team working, leadership and communication skills. Through their active involvement, students are encouraged to monitor their own learning and gain a degree of self-direction. Two main factors are to be considered: content of the educational session, and the characteristics of the learning and teaching process. Both depend on the purpose (i.e. educational aims and objectives) of the session.
Materials scientists and engineers will usually work in teams, solving problems, particularly associated with the development of new materials for given applications. Analysis, critique, assessment of selection criteria, redefining problems or problem finding, as well as creative thinking are all essential elements of their jobs. Students need to develop these skills as well as enhance their ability to communicate their creative ideas and their finished work or innovation to an audience (customer, designer, etc.) (Dewulf and Baillie, 1999).
The specific purpose of tutorials can be any, or all, of the following three; subject or course academic support, skills development, or personal tutorials (mentoring).
The academic tutorial 'is concerned with the development of the student's powers of thought' (Jacques, 1991) within a subject or course. It is, in general, aimed at one to six students - in a one-to-one tutorial the tutor may focus completely on work completed by the student. In some situations, classwork sessions of between twenty to thirty students are also called tutorials, as their main aim is interaction with students, and for the students to work and think during the session.
Some tutorials or small group work is designed to promote certain personal transferable or professional 'key' skills. Schemes are increasingly introduced into degree programmes to improve students' skills in teamwork, communication (oral and written), leadership, creativity, etc (Dewulf and Baillie, 1999). These might be 'add on' sessions with the whole class, in small groups, or as part of the academic or personal tutoring system. They might also be integrated throughout the degree programme.
Specific attempts are made in the first year in many universities for students to learn how to learn (Baillie, 1999). There has been a move in recent years away from the 'study skills' approach of telling students how to study, and towards the idea of helping students develop a responsibility towards learning which motivates them to understand rather than reproduce (deep rather than surface approach) (Ramsden, 1991).
In most UK universities lecturers are allocated one or more personal tutees who they are asked to 'monitor' during their time of study. This practice is very ad-hoc, with some academics taking their role more seriously than others. Some personal tutors see their students once every two weeks at least for the first year. Some never see their tutees, but students at least know they are there. This can be less than satisfactory in some instances where lack of support was found to be the main cause of student dropout. Personal tutors are rarely trained for their job, and neither student nor lecturer fully understands the boundaries of their role. It is obvious that they cannot be a 'counsellor', and yet this is often the term used to describe their role.
In the UK it is common for lecturers to take tutorials, both academic and personal. In some Universities lecturers are trained in small group teaching techniques as part of their initial induction, but less are trained in personal tutoring/mentoring skills. Senior tutors oversee the system in many UK Universities, who are responsible for the personal or sometimes the academic tutorial schemes of Departments. Therefore, the effectiveness of tutorials in different Departments often relies on the Senior Tutor's capabilities and responsibility.
Peer tutoring schemes have been successfully implemented in many Universities worldwide to promote student learning (Magin and Churches, 1997). Peer tutors help younger students to learn by holding group sessions in which certain topics are discussed. The aim of the scheme is not to provide textbook answers to set problems or even to provide formal supplementary teaching, rather it is the peer tutor's role to act as a focus for the group and thereby make it work for itself. More specifically, the group provides a supportive environment for new students:
In the Department of Materials at Imperial College London a peer tutoring scheme was established in October 1997 for the first year crystallography students, focused on the learning of crystallography (Baillie and Grimes 1999). This has proved very popular over the years with at least 60% voluntary attendance.
In many Universities training of staff is a compulsory part of their induction. Small group teaching may or may not be included in the workshops that staff have to take as part of their training. However, mid career staff may never have been trained in small group techniques and have little understanding as to their role and function, nor any experience of facilitating rather than teaching or lecturing. Mentors are rarely trained unless an optional course is provided which a handful of interested staff will take. Senior tutors are rarely trained. Postgraduate tutors are less often trained. Peer tutors are always trained, and this is an imperative and very effective part of the peer tutoring schemes that are run. The training is often seen as so useful that some lecturers could also profit from such a course.
Interaction, both learner-to-learner and learner-to-tutor, is another powerful method of ensuring learners maintain an appropriate pace, and judicious intervention by tutors can help motivate and encourage learners to keep going.
Materials classes often consist of students of mixed abilities and backgrounds, with and without chemistry or maths. The class may even be from different disciplines or branches of Engineering. Therefore, tutors have to teach students the same core Materials information - so how can they deal with this, and motivate the students?
Engineers often see Materials as a subsidiary subject. Only when Materials failure occurs does the importance of Material selection become apparent. What can tutors do to encourage motivation for studying Materials?
How do tutors stimulate students to develop a 'feel' for a Material and a mental picture of how a Material behaves? What teaching and learning innovations help address the changing skills base of University students?
Baillie, C.A. (1999) Learning to Learn (Imperial College London).
Baillie, C.A. and Grimes, R. (1999) Peer tutoring in Crystallography, European Journal of Engineering Education 24 (2) p173.
Dewulf, S. and Baillie, C.A. (1999) CASE: Creativity in Art, Science and Engineering, (DfEE, London).
Jaques, D. (2000) Learning in Groups (Kogan Page, London).
Magin, D. and Churches, A. (1995) Peer tutoring in engineering design: a case study, Studies in Higher Education 20 (1) p 73-85.
Marton, F. and Booth, S. (1997) Learning and Awareness, (Lawrence Erlbaum Association, New Jersey, USA).
Parker, V. (1999) Thinking about disability access to HE, New Academic 8 (2) p19-21.